Mоst students during kindergаrten аnd first grаde are at what stage оf cоgnitive development?
Questiоns 28-31 refer tо the fоllowing pаssаge. “Interestingly, the Congress System wаs the combination of distinct antidotes proposed by the Great Powers. The British Cabinet and its diplomats, led by Viscount Castlereagh, still believed in its earlier formula, 'the balance of power'…. At Vienna, just as at Utrecht a century before, Britain considered it essential to contain France against a possible military resurgence. As for Austria, Prince Klemens von Metternich also relied on a form of 'balance of power', though his application was more down-to-earth. In 1813, when the victorious Russian army marched into Germany and liberated Berlin, joining a coalition against France had become a life or death proposition for Austria….It had no option other than to go along with Russia and to enter into a 'balance of negotiation', playing off the allies of the same bloc against each other. Surprisingly, the Russian view on peace in Europe proved by far the most elaborate. Three months after the final act of the Congress, Tsar Alexander proposed a treaty to his partners, the Holy Alliance….There is a polarised interpretation, especially in France, that the 'Holy Alliance' (in a broad sense) had only been a regression, both social and political. Castlereagh joked that it was a 'piece of sublime mysticism and nonsense', even though he recommended Britain to undersign it.” --Stella Ghervas, historian, A Peace for the Strong, 2014 Ghervas recommends studying which of the following country’s’ view of the peace [at the Congress of Vienna] as the most important in helping a historian to interpret the intricacies of the Congress System?